NY Times filibustering

NY Times’ Weisman writing on deadline, copy desk snoozing:

Published: February 15, 2013 389 Comments

WASHINGTON As the Senate edged toward a divisive filibuster vote on Chuck Hagels nomination to be defense secretary, SenatorTed Cruz, Republican of Texas, sat silent and satisfied in the corner of the chamber his voice lost to laryngitis as he absorbed what he had wrought in his mere seven weeks of Senate service.

Get a load of that “divisive,” as if filibusters are not divisive by nature.


Mr. Hagel, a former senator from Mr. Cruzs own party, was about to be the victim of the first filibuster of a nominee to lead the Pentagon.

Victim? How about subject? Or object?

Those nits picked, it’s a good profile, on which I congratulate Mr. Weisman.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  • nancyjthorner  On February 15, 2013 at 11:47 PM

    Kudos of the highest to Ted Cruz! More men like Ted Cruz are needed in politics who are willing to speak the truth, not mincing words. By even irritating some Republican establishment senators like John McCain, this is more than enough to tell me that Ted Cruz was not-out-of-line in any way in his rhetoric but right on target.


  • Margaret McC.  On February 16, 2013 at 10:58 AM



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: